• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Immigration Law of Montana

Christopher J. Flann, Attorney

406-373-9828
  • Make an Appointment
  • Client Log In
  • Home

Immigration Law of Montana

  • About
    • Christopher Flann, Attorney
    • Collette Layton, Legal Assistant
    • Rockwell “Rock” Hinkle, Legal Assistant
    • ILM Scholarships
    • Reviews and Testimonials
    • Gabriela Veroes Legal Assistant
    • Maryangel Aguilera Legal Assistant
  • US Citizenship
    • Citizenship through Adoption
    • Citizenship through Naturalization
    • Citizenship through Military
    • Derivative US Citizenship
  • Green Cards
    • Adjustment of Status
    • Asylee Green Card
    • Conditional Green Card Renewal
    • Employment Based Green Card
    • Consular Processing
    • Family Based Green Card
    • Green Card for Religious Worker
    • Green Card through Marriage
    • Green Card through Refugee or Asylee Status
    • Parole in Place Green Card
    • Green Card Renewal
    • Humanitarian Green Card
    • Refugee Green Card
    • Sheepherder Green Card
    • Marrying an Illegal Immigrant
    • For American Indians Born in Canada
    • Special Immigrant Visa
  • Immigration Guides
    • Immigration for Employers
    • Immigration for Investors
    • Immigration for Farmers and Ranchers
    • Immigration for Religious Organizations
  • US Visas
    • E-1 Visa Treaty Trader Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • E-2 Visa Treaty Investor Montana Wyoming North Dakota
    • H-1B Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • E-3 Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • H-2A Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • H-2B Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • H-3 Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • K-1 Fiancé Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • K-3 Spouse Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • O-1 Visa for Artists, Scientists, Educators, Businesspeople and Athletes
    • P-3 Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • R-1 Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • TN Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • U Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • Change of Status: Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming
    • Visa Extension Extension of Stay
    • Process for US Visa Application Through Admission and Stay
    • Entry into United States
    • I-94 Admission Record
    • Volunteer Visa USA
    • Humanitarian Parole
    • Leaving the United States
  • Immigration Services
    • RFE USCIS What it Means and How to Fix
    • Apostille Services
    • Document Translation Services
    • Illegal Immigrant Arrested in Montana
    • Why A Strategy Consultation
  • Service Area
    • Immigration Lawyer North Dakota
    • Immigration Lawyer Wyoming
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • English
    • Español
You are here: Home / Blog / Why Asylee Green Card Applications Take So Much Longer: INA 209 vs. 245 Adjustment Explained

Why Asylee Green Card Applications Take So Much Longer: INA 209 vs. 245 Adjustment Explained

July 8, 2025 by Admin-ILM

The Asylee Advantage

Bottom Line Up Front: Asylees adjusting status under INA 209 face processing times of 29-45 months compared to family-based adjustments under INA 245 taking 12.5-20.5 months. The difference stems from unique documentation requirements, mandatory interviews, enhanced security screening, and specialized processing procedures that don’t apply to most other green card applicants.

Understanding the Two Pathways

When applying for a green card while in the United States, most immigrants file under INA Section 245 – the general adjustment of status provision. However, asylees must use a completely different legal pathway: INA Section 209(b), which contains specific requirements and procedures that significantly extend processing times.

INA 245: The Standard Route

Most immigrants – including those married to U.S. citizens, employment-based applicants, and diversity visa winners – adjust status under INA 245. This established process benefits from:

For more information on standard green card processes in Montana, see our comprehensive guide

  • Streamlined procedures developed over decades
  • High application volume that creates processing efficiency
  • Optional interviews for many categories
  • Fewer documentation requirements for admissibility
  • No mandatory waiting periods after filing

INA 209: The Asylee-Specific Route

Asylees must use INA 209(b), which Congress designed specifically for those granted protection in the United States. This pathway includes additional safeguards and requirements that extend processing times significantly.

The Key Differences That Create Delays

1. Mandatory Physical Presence Documentation

INA 209 Requirement: Asylees must have been physically present in the United States for one year when USCIS adjudicates their Form I-485, not just when they file it. This creates unique documentation challenges.

Why It Delays Processing:

  • USCIS must verify continuous physical presence, not just residence
  • Officers must review extensive documentation proving day-by-day presence
  • Any gaps in documentation trigger Requests for Evidence (RFEs)
  • If USCIS cannot determine whether an applicant satisfies the one-year physical presence requirement, they may request additional evidence, and it might take longer to process

Documentation Challenges:

  • School transcripts and attendance records
  • Employment records showing daily work
  • Medical records with appointment dates
  • Utility bills and lease agreements
  • Travel documents for any departures
  • Affidavits from witnesses to physical presence

2. Enhanced Security and Background Checks

INA 209 Requirements: USCIS will determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether an interview by an immigration officer is necessary to determine the applicant’s admissibility, but interviews are significantly more common for asylees.

Why It Delays Processing:

  • Enhanced security screening due to asylum background
  • Review of entire asylum case file and decision
  • Verification that asylum status remains valid
  • Additional background checks through multiple agencies
  • Case-by-case interview determinations add processing steps

3. Complex Inadmissibility Analysis

INA 209 Specifics: Because an asylee is not subject to admissibility grounds at the time of the asylum grant, the adjudication of the adjustment application may be the first instance that inadmissibility grounds are considered.

Processing Complications:

  • Full medical examination required (unlike some INA 245 categories)
  • The asylee is required to establish compliance with the vaccination requirements
  • Comprehensive review of criminal and immigration history
  • Waiver applications often needed for technical violations

4. Limited Waiver Options

INA 209 Restrictions: An applicant who is not admissible may have the grounds of inadmissibility waived except for those grounds under sections 212(a)(2)(C) and 212(a)(3)(A), (B), (C), or (E).

Why This Causes Delays:

  • Careful legal analysis required for each inadmissibility ground
  • Waiver applications (Form I-602) add months to processing
  • Limited waiver availability creates complex eligibility determinations
  • Officers must balance humanitarian factors against statutory restrictions

5. Comprehensive Review of Underlying Asylum Decision

INA 209 Requirement: In determining eligibility for adjustment of status of an alien with asylum status, the officer should review the underlying application (either Form I-589 or Form I-730) that provided the alien with asylum status.

Why This Creates Massive Delays:

  • Complete legal re-examination: Officers must review the entire asylum case file and legal determination
  • Fraud detection analysis: Officers look for new evidence that the original asylum grant was improper
  • Ongoing refugee status verification: Determination of whether the person still meets the refugee definition
  • Country condition updates: Research into whether conditions have changed since asylum was granted
  • Identity reconciliation: Verification that the adjustment applicant is the same person granted asylum

Comparison to Other Categories:

  • I-130 Family Cases: Simple relationship verification (marriage/birth certificates)
  • I-140 Employment Cases: Job qualifications and labor certification review
  • I-589 Asylum Reviews: Complex legal determination about persecution, credibility, and protection needs

Processing Impact: This represents a fundamental difference in complexity. While family and employment cases involve document verification, asylee cases require re-examining a sophisticated legal determination about persecution, credibility, and international protection – essentially a “second look” at the asylum decision itself.

6. Specialized Officer Training Requirements

Resource Allocation Issues:

  • Fewer officers trained in both INA 209 procedures and asylum law complexities
  • Unless a case is sent specifically to a field office for resolution of Terrorist Related Inadmissibility Ground (TRIG) issues, an officer should return any asylee adjustment case with unresolved TRIG issues to the originating service center
  • Cases often transferred between offices for specialized review
  • Limited processing capacity compared to high-volume INA 245 applications
Comparison flowchart showing INA 209 asylee adjustment taking 29-45 months versus INA 245 standard adjustment taking 12-20 months, with detailed breakdown of processing factors
Visual comparison of INA 209 vs INA 245 processing requirements and timelines

Current Processing Time Reality

Recent Data Shows Significant Disparities

current USCIS processing time estimates

  • Asylee Adjustments (INA 209): 29 to 45 months
  • Family-based Adjustments (INA 245):5 to 20.5 months
  • Refugee Adjustments (INA 209): 14 months (significantly faster than asylees)

Why Refugee Adjustments Are Faster

Refugees benefit from pre-screening overseas and often have:

  • Complete documentation from refugee processing
  • Medical examinations already completed
  • Background checks conducted before U.S. entry
  • Established identity verification

Document Preservation: Critical for Asylee Cases

Essential Records to Maintain

Asylum Documentation:

  • Original asylum approval notice or court order
  • All correspondence with immigration courts or USCIS
  • Attorney representation records from asylum case
  • Country condition evidence used in asylum case

Physical Presence Evidence:

  • Employment Records: Pay stubs, W-2s, employment verification letters
  • Educational Records: Transcripts, enrollment verification, attendance records
  • Medical Records: Doctor visits, prescription records, hospital admissions
  • Financial Records: Bank statements, tax returns, credit card statements
  • Housing Records: Lease agreements, utility bills, mortgage statements

Travel Documentation:

  • Any advance parole documents used
  • Entry/exit stamps in passport
  • Documentation of any emergency travel
  • Refugee travel documents if applicable

Common Documentation Pitfalls

Insufficient Physical Presence Proof:

  • Gaps in employment or school records
  • Missing documentation for specific time periods
  • Failure to document brief trips outside the U.S.
  • Inadequate witness statements for undocumented periods

Medical Examination Issues:

  • Using non-designated civil surgeons
  • Incomplete vaccination records
  • Expired medical examinations
  • Missing required supplemental forms

When Waivers May Be Required

Common Inadmissibility Issues for Asylees

Immigration-Related Grounds:

  • Unauthorized employment before asylum grant
  • Unlawful presence accrual
  • Document fraud during initial entry
  • Failure to maintain status before asylum approval

Criminal Grounds:

  • Minor criminal violations
  • Arrests without convictions
  • Civil violations treated as criminal matters
  • Conduct occurring before asylum grant

Waiver Application Strategy

Form I-602 Applications:

  • Filed concurrently with I-485 or separately
  • An asylee adjustment applicant may have a ground of inadmissibility waived for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest
  • No extreme hardship requirement (unlike other waivers)
  • Discretionary decisions requiring compelling evidence

The Role of Interviews in Delays

Why Asylee Interviews Are More Complex

Comprehensive Case Review:

  • Verification of asylum claim validity
  • Review of changed country conditions
  • Assessment of continued refugee status
  • Evaluation of family relationships for derivatives

Extended Interview Preparation:

  • Review of entire asylum file
  • Country condition research updates
  • Security clearance verification
  • Coordination between multiple USCIS offices

Planning Your Asylee Adjustment Strategy

Optimal Timing Considerations

When to File:

  • Your application may be processed more quickly if you wait until 1 year after you are granted asylum to file Form I-485
  • Ensure all required documentation is complete
  • Consider concurrent filing of derivative applications
  • Plan for potential RFEs and interview scheduling

Working with Experienced Counsel

Why Professional Guidance Matters:

  • Complex interplay between asylum and adjustment law
  • Waiver eligibility requires careful legal analysis
  • Document preparation strategies can prevent delays
  • Interview preparation for asylee-specific questions

Recent Policy Changes Affecting Processing

February 2023 USCIS Clarification

USCIS updated guidance to clarify that both asylees and refugees must have been physically present in the United States for one year when we adjudicate their Form I-485, rather than at the time they file their adjustment of status application.

Impact on Processing:

  • Cases filed early may face longer adjudication waits
  • Enhanced documentation requirements for physical presence
  • Increased RFE rates for insufficient presence evidence

Conclusion

Facing asylee adjustment delays? Get experienced guidance from a Montana immigration attorney who understands the complexities of INA 209 cases.

The dramatic difference in processing times between INA 209 and INA 245 adjustments reflects the complexity and specialized nature of asylee cases. While family-based and employment adjustments follow well-established procedures with predictable timelines, asylee adjustments require individualized review of protection claims, enhanced security screening, and complex legal determinations.

Working with an experienced Montana immigration attorney can help navigate these complex requirements.

Understanding these differences helps asylees and their families plan appropriately for the extended timeline while taking steps to minimize delays through careful documentation and strategic timing of their applications.

Once you receive your green card, understand the asylee advantage for naturalization that allows citizenship after just 4 years.

Key Takeaways:

  • Asylee adjustments take 2-3 times longer than standard family-based cases
  • Physical presence documentation is the most common source of delays
  • Professional legal assistance can help navigate complex waiver requirements
  • Early preparation and comprehensive documentation are essential for success

 

This article provides general information about immigration law and should not be considered legal advice for your specific situation. For personalized guidance on your asylee adjustment case, consult with a qualified immigration attorney who can evaluate your individual circumstances.

Filed Under: Blog

Footer

Our Location

We are located about 20 minutes NE of Billings in a rural community:

Immigration Law of Montana, P.C.
8400 Clark Rd
Shepherd, MT 59079
406-373-9828

Affiliations

Montana State Bar

AILA Member

 

Social

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Immigration Lawyer Montana
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us

COPYRIGHT © 2025 Immigration Law of Montana · All Rights Reserved

  • English
  • Español