• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Immigration Law of Montana

Christopher J. Flann, Attorney

406-373-9828
  • Make an Appointment
  • Client Log In
  • Home

Immigration Law of Montana

  • About
    • Christopher Flann, Attorney
    • Collette Layton, Legal Assistant
    • Rockwell “Rock” Hinkle, Legal Assistant
    • ILM Scholarships
    • Reviews and Testimonials
    • Gabriela Veroes Legal Assistant
    • Maryangel Aguilera Legal Assistant
  • US Citizenship
    • Citizenship through Adoption
    • Citizenship through Naturalization
    • Citizenship through Military
    • Derivative US Citizenship
  • Green Cards
    • Adjustment of Status
    • Asylee Green Card
    • Conditional Green Card Renewal
    • Employment Based Green Card
    • Consular Processing
    • Family Based Green Card
    • Green Card for Religious Worker
    • Green Card through Marriage
    • Green Card through Refugee or Asylee Status
    • Parole in Place Green Card
    • Green Card Renewal
    • Humanitarian Green Card
    • Refugee Green Card
    • Sheepherder Green Card
    • Marrying an Illegal Immigrant
    • For American Indians Born in Canada
    • Special Immigrant Visa
    • Widowhood Immigration Cases
  • Immigration Guides
    • Immigration for Employers
    • Immigration for Investors
    • Immigration for Farmers and Ranchers
    • Immigration for Religious Organizations
  • US Visas
    • E-1 Visa Treaty Trader Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • E-2 Visa Treaty Investor Montana Wyoming North Dakota
    • H-1B Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • E-3 Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • H-2A Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • H-2B Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • H-3 Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • K-1 Fiancé Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • K-3 Spouse Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • O-1 Visa for Artists, Scientists, Educators, Businesspeople and Athletes
    • P-3 Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • R-1 Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • TN Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • U Visa Montana North Dakota Wyoming
    • Change of Status: Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming
    • Visa Extension Extension of Stay
    • Process for US Visa Application Through Admission and Stay
    • Entry into United States
    • I-94 Admission Record
    • Volunteer Visa USA
    • Humanitarian Parole
    • Leaving the United States
  • Immigration Services
    • RFE USCIS What it Means and How to Fix
    • Apostille Services
    • Document Translation Services
    • Illegal Immigrant Arrested in Montana
    • Why A Strategy Consultation
  • Removal Defense
  • Service Area
    • Immigration Lawyer North Dakota
    • Immigration Lawyer Wyoming
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • English
    • Español

Uncategorized

USCIS Signature Crisis: Why Your Digital Signature Could Derail Your Immigration Case

September 15, 2025 by Admin-ILM

Hand signing USCIS immigration form with pen showing proper wet signature technique

If you’ve received a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) from USCIS claiming your signature is invalid, you’re not alone. Immigration attorneys across the country are reporting a surge in these denials, particularly for H-1B cases, and the consequences can be devastating for your immigration timeline and legal status.

The Problem: When Technology Meets Immigration Law

Here’s what’s happening: USCIS appears to be using artificial intelligence (AI) to detect when the same signature image appears multiple times across different parts of a form or across multiple forms. What might seem like an efficient business practice—using a saved digital signature file—is now triggering automatic scrutiny and potential denials.

The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) has been tracking this issue since it first emerged with humanitarian cases and has now documented its spread to H-1B lottery cases and other petition types. According to AILA’s September 2025 practice alert, these cases are being flagged when “the company’s signatory has pasted a copy of their signature rather than signing each form with a ‘wet’ signature.”

Understanding the Legal Distinction: Digital vs. Scanned Signatures

This might seem like semantics, but in immigration law, the distinction is crucial and legally significant. According to the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 1, Part B, Chapter 2, there are two acceptable approaches to signatures:

  1. Original wet signature that is later reproduced: You physically sign the document, then scan, photocopy, or fax that signed document
  2. Electronic signature as permitted by form instructions: Following specific electronic signature protocols outlined in the form instructions

What USCIS is rejecting are saved signature graphics—digital image files of signatures that are inserted into multiple documents without the person actually signing each individual form.

The Policy Manual is clear: “A signature is valid even if the original signature on the document is photocopied, scanned, faxed, or similarly reproduced. Regardless of how it is transmitted to USCIS, the copy must be of an original document containing an original handwritten signature.” (8 CFR 103.2(a)(2))

The key phrase here is “original document containing an original handwritten signature.” If you’re pasting a saved signature file, there was never an original handwritten signature on that specific document.

Why These Are Usually NOIDs, Not RFEs

When USCIS discovers what they believe to be a pasted signature graphic, they typically issue a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) rather than a Request for Evidence (RFE). Here’s why this distinction matters:

  • RFE: Requests additional evidence to support your case
  • NOID: Indicates USCIS intends to deny unless you can overcome their concerns

The problem is that if your original filing used a pasted signature graphic, there often isn’t a way to “fix” this issue. You can’t retroactively create an original wet signature that was never made. Some attorneys report that even when they submit newly signed original documents in response to NOIDs, USCIS still proceeds with denial because the original filing lacked a valid signature.

The AI Detection Factor

Based on reports from immigration practitioners, USCIS appears to be using AI technology to identify cases where signatures are identical across multiple parts of forms or across multiple filings. This technology can detect minute details in signature reproduction that suggest the same digital file was used multiple times rather than multiple original signatures being made.

While USCIS hasn’t officially confirmed their use of AI for signature detection, the pattern of cases being flagged suggests automated screening is occurring during the initial review process.

The Litigation Response

Given the significant investment many employers and individuals have in their immigration cases, some are turning to federal litigation to challenge these denials. Immigration attorneys report mixed success with this approach, and litigation adds both time and expense to an already complex process.

The regulatory basis for these challenges often centers on whether USCIS’s signature policy exceeds the scope of the underlying regulation. The regulation at 8 CFR 103.2(a)(2) simply requires signatures to be “handwritten,” while the Policy Manual adds additional requirements about original documents.

Prevention: Why Our Office Might Seem “Picky” About Signatures

At Immigration Law of Montana, if we reject a signature method at our office, it might seem unnecessarily picky. But we have a good reason: this exact policy issue. If a signature method seems “offending” to us, it will likely seem that way to USCIS as well. We’re trying to save you from the heartache, delays, and potential denial that come with signature-related NOIDs.

Here’s our recommended approach for Rocky Mountain state clients:

For Individual Petitioners:

  • Always physically sign each document by hand
  • After signing, scan or photocopy the signed document
  • Never use saved signature image files or digital stamp signatures
  • Keep the original signed documents for your records

For Corporate Signatories:

  • Ensure authorized signers physically sign each petition
  • Maintain original signed documents in company files
  • Train staff on proper signature procedures to avoid costly mistakes
  • Consider the time investment of proper signatures as insurance against denials

What USCIS Considers Acceptable vs. Unacceptable

According to the USCIS Policy Manual, acceptable signatures include:

  • Original handwritten signatures
  • Handwritten “X” or similar marks (if unable to write)
  • Abbreviated signatures (if consistent with normal signing)
  • Signatures by parents/guardians for children under 14
  • Signatures under valid power of attorney for incapacitated adults
  • Original signatures that are later photocopied, scanned, or faxed

Unacceptable signatures include:

  • Typed names on signature lines
  • Signatures created by typewriter, word processor, stamp, or auto-pen
  • Attorney signatures on behalf of clients (with limited exceptions)
  • Saved digital signature graphics pasted into documents

The Regional Advantage: Rocky Mountain State Expertise

For clients in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Utah, Idaho, and Colorado, working with an attorney who understands both the national trends and regional USCIS processing patterns can be crucial. Our experience with the various service centers that process cases from the Rocky Mountain states gives us insight into how these signature issues are being handled in practice, not just in policy.

The Bottom Line: Technology Isn’t Always Your Friend

While technology has streamlined many aspects of immigration practice, signature shortcuts can create expensive problems. The convenience of saving a few minutes with digital signature files can cost months or years in delays, thousands in legal fees, and potentially derail your entire immigration case.

The old-fashioned approach—physically signing documents before scanning them—remains the safest path forward. In immigration law, where precision and compliance are everything, it’s better to be traditional than sorry.

When You Need Help

If you’ve received a signature-related NOID or RFE, time is critical. These notices typically provide only 30 days to respond, and the response strategy depends heavily on the specific circumstances of your original filing and the evidence available to support your case.

At Immigration Law of Montana, we’ve been helping clients navigate complex USCIS policies and procedures for nearly three decades. Our approach combines thorough knowledge of current regulations with practical experience in what actually works with USCIS adjudications.

Whether you’re facing a signature-related denial or want to ensure your future filings avoid these pitfalls, we’re here to help clients throughout the Rocky Mountain states with experienced, detail-oriented representation.

 

This article is based on current USCIS policies and recent reports from immigration practitioners. Immigration law and policies change frequently. For specific advice about your situation, consult with an experienced immigration attorney.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

New USCIS Rule for B-1 and B-2s Wishing to Become F-1 Students

June 21, 2017 by Admin-ILM

New USCIS Rule for B-1 and B-2s Wishing to Become F-1 Students

USCIS recently updated its rules about change of status from a tourist or business status to F-1 student status. Due to this rule change, we are starting to see a lot of clients requesting help with RFEs that they have received from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The USCIS is now requiring that students maintain status up to 30 days before they intend to enroll in school.

Background Change of Status to Student

USCIS regulations have never permitted those in the United States in B-1 business status or B-2 tourist status to enroll in or attend school. To enroll in school, you must be in F-1 or M1 status. Sometimes it is easier to get B-1 or B-2 status and visit the United States to scout out a college or school to attend. Once you have identified the best college or school, you would apply through change of status for USCIS permission to enroll. Nothing about this policy has changed.

How the USCIS Change in Policy Affects Pending Change in Status Requests

To consider how the new policy change affects B-1 or B-2 status holders in filing a change of status application, we need to understand when people file for change of status and how long it takes the USCIS to adjudicate that request. Let’s look at this change through a worked example.

Let’s assume Bob is in B-2 status and that expires on January 31, 2017. Bob applied to change his status to F-1 status with a start date at the school of June 30, 2017. He submitted his application for change of status on January 15, 2017 while he was still in status. Under the old rule, the USCIS would have adjudicated and probably approved this change of status request. Bob succeed because he filed before his status expired.

Under the new rule, Bob will receive an RFE request. The USCIS RFE will cite the fact that USCIS requires Bob to maintain his status until at least May 30, 2017. The RFE requests will invite Bob to file another I-539 extension of status/change of status application with another fee to fill in this gap.

How to Respond to These New RFE Requests

A lot of people who receive these RFE requests are complaining about having to submit another I-539 extension of status request and pay an extra fee. They argue that as they submitted under the old rule, the USCIS should grandfather their application.

Reasonable people could differ on how best to deal with this problem. We are a very pragmatic immigration law firm, believing that achieving our clients’ goal is our most important duty. We therefore prepare and file a new I-539 request for extension of stay to fill-in the client’s status gap. Once we have the receipt for this request we included with our response to the RFE.

Other attorneys may choose to argue with the USCIS. It may be the case that they will be successful. Alternatively, the USCIS may issue them denials. As you may not appeal the denial of a change of status request, it is difficult to see how this route will lead to achieving the client’s goals.

How We Can Help

If you are trying to change your status to enroll in or attend school and have a pending request with the USCIS, we can assist you in responding to an RFE that you receive. If you would like to get help with this issue, please contact us for a strategy consultation.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Footer

Our Location

We are located about 20 minutes NE of Billings in a rural community:

Immigration Law of Montana, P.C.
8400 Clark Rd
Shepherd, MT 59079
406-373-9828

Affiliations

Montana State Bar

AILA Member

 

Social

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Immigration Lawyer Montana
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us

COPYRIGHT © 2025 Immigration Law of Montana · All Rights Reserved

  • English
  • Español